Talk:Appearance energy: Difference between revisions
From Mass Spec Terms
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Jean-Fran??????????????ois GAL?????????????? | Jean-Fran?***?*?**??****?*??***?*?**?**?*??ois GAL?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** | ||
02-28-2004 10:48 AM ET (US) | 02-28-2004 10:48 AM ET (US) | ||
??????????????"The term 'appearance potential' is not recommended." | ?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?*****"The term 'appearance potential' is not recommended." | ||
I suggest to state that "potential" for any kind of energy is simply NOT CORRECT (the same for 'ionization potential" etc...) | I suggest to state that "potential" for any kind of energy is simply NOT CORRECT (the same for 'ionization potential" etc...) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 11:49, 11 March 2024
Jean-Fran?***?*?**??****?*??***?*?**?**?*??ois GAL?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 02-28-2004 10:48 AM ET (US)
?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?*****"The term 'appearance potential' is not recommended." I suggest to state that "potential" for any kind of energy is simply NOT CORRECT (the same for 'ionization potential" etc...)
