Talk:Mass/charge Ratio

From Mass Spec Terms
Revision as of 08:03, 15 January 2005 by Ionworker (talk | contribs)

Jean-Fran??????????????ois GAL?????????????? 02-28-2004 10:07 AM ET (US)

"Mass/charge ratio Add your comment on this item (m/z) ratio." Sorry to insist ... Sparkman would say "mass-to-charge ratio".


m/z is wrong

let's get rid of the m/z. It is conceptually wrong. I made a new proposal.


I moved the Suggested Definition from the front page and used the new template:

This template is no longer used.

(Note that this isn't my def, just my edit to put it on the Discussion page - KKM)

-- K. Murray 15:03, 13 Jan 2005 (CST)